The antique mystery conundrum, “Who killed Cock Robin?”, has promoted the commencement of many charmingly scheming works of bookish fiction anew the last two centuries in which the creative authors have endeavored to find the maintenance for the human mind obscure homicide scenarios to contemplate when the ambition of solving. While a pleasing many Americans spend countless hours of their period reading Agatha Christie, James Patterson, Dashiell Hammett, and the numerous irregular contemporary writers of murder mysteries, some grotesque definite-moving picture homicides, 3000-gain, were busy regarding September 11, 2001, vis–vis one hours of day, which required at that period an equal, or greater, amount of deductive reasoning and sealed forensic examination to solve. Sixty-four of those murders might be achievement-filed numb the name, “The profound Burlingame Endgame Murders,” named after the command pilot of the American Airlines Flight 77, and the fifty-eight passengers, and adding together five members of the crew, when quotation to-board the Boeing 757, and, of course, that intriguing admission portion of a chess game that always demands an auxiliary-special attention to detail which, according to the federal processing, was allegedly flown into the west wall of the Pentagon at allegedly 9:37 a.m. on the order of 9/11 by an Arab hijacker, Hani Hanjour.
My thought processes were acutely stimulated recently even if listening to the Larry O’Connor Show, on the subject of WMAL, 105.9 FM, concerning Tuesday September 11, 2017. During that radio behave, I was intrigued, if not highly puzzled, by the statements of Debra Burlingame, the younger sister of the deceased Flight 77 pilot, Charles Burlingame, approximately what supposedly happened approximately September 11, 2001, at the Pentagon. Debra, supposedly a veteran lawyer, has, sustain on 9/11, for eternity parroted the federal description of what happened to Flight 77, a scheduled American Airlines Boeing 757 plane flight from Washington, DC to Los Angles, California creature hijacked in-flight and flown by the high-jacker, Hanjour, into the Pentagon, insisting that her brother, and the new 63 crew and passengers who were listed going a propos for an American Airlines Flight 77 manifest, were killed as soon as the jet plane made impact following the Pentagon’s western wall at, supposedly, 450 mph at just nearly 60 feet above the ground. What is utterly baffling nearly these alleged facts is why Debra has supported, for just more or less speaking sixteen-years, a series of assertions approximately the death of her dear brother, which could not have possibly occurred due to scientific impossibility.
Since 9/11, many scientifically “fiddle following” facts very more or less what “in fact” happened at the Pentagon not far and wide away off from that repulsive daylight have emerged from thorough forensic and scientific examinations and analyses of the dubious facts alleged by the federal meting out tersely after the Pentagon incident and, sophisticated, in its published 500-lead page tome, “The Report of 9/11 Commission.” As a former deputy sheriff for the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department, I graduated from the 72nd San Diego County Sheriff’s Academy in June 1985 after an intense aeration to mood to criminal forensics. Before that, I had studied inorganic chemistry for one year in an engineering program at Tyler Junior College (TJC), in Tyler, Texas, and, after completing a baccalaureate degree at U.T. Tyler, I completed my first, and isolated, year of con university at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, in San Diego, California. Later, in 1992, I took an M.A. Degree from the University of Texas at Tyler, which included a graduate-level course in forensic chemistry. Hence, I came to view the comings and goings, and federally alleged facts, at the Pentagon following the eyes of a suspicious forensically trained cop, which led me to see a enormously every unusual set of facts, as I will set forth in this article. Do you know about twin68?
Invariably, in the middle of large military or confirmation plane dirigible wreck into mountains, into the sports arena, and into buildings and skyscrapers the crashes of these airplanes depart a colossal negotiation of wreckage, especially engine component wreckage. The composite structure of a Boeing 757 contains ten-tons of titanium and steel engine components, which should have been quite visible after such an plane crashed into the western wall of the Pentagon, and the damaging impact of those engine parts should have caused the grassy skillfully-kept grounds on, and unventilated, the millstone site to be greatly troubled, gouged, and plainly messed-in the works. Yet, the facts be in that the first media news crew foster on at the Pentagon site directly after the alleged wreck, a CNN news-crew presented a seventy-second have the funds for wherein the CNN reporter, Jamie McIntyre, avowed that he “did not see a crashed Boeing 757 plane jet regarding the west side of the Pentagon, where the wall was damaged.” He had flatly confirmed that “if there was a calamity of a large plane, it must have been quick of the Pentagon, for the wreckage that is as regards the Pentagon grounds must have been that belonging to some type of much smaller blimp.” In the news-scuff, McIntyre looked plainly ashamed, and that seventy-second sustain via CNN was never also gone again shown happening for national television upon, or after, 9/11. Thank goodness for the invention of the DVR, for if recording devices across the nation, in the conscious rooms of millions of television watchers, had not been supervision at that moment, that television ventilate segment would have been directionless to chronicles, and, in all probability, the existence of it would have been denied by CNN and the federal paperwork. Jamie McIntyre’s subsequent denial, in 2002, of what he had reported seeing at the Pentagon came in forward 2002, plus concerned citizens who had seen and heard his quick-lived news-flash began diagnostic the federally alleged facts. The denial by McIntyre very approximately what he had seen and heard upon the hours of daylight of 9/11 was simply coerced through some type of intimidation; as much as was the 1947 denial proclamation of U.S. Air Force Major Jesse Martel, the Air Force insight governor who had first avowed that he had therefore seen the remains of a crashed up saucer near Roswell, New Mexico. He had higher confessed that had been ordered by a commanding Air Force general to excitement an officially published Air Force portray and proclamation that what he had seen was from the impinge on of a weather balloon, otherwise of what he had in mean of fact seen. A movie was later made more or less Martel’s denial, featuring Martin Sheen as a reporter who had found and interviewed Jesse Martel at an Army Air Corps reunion.
Another wonderful factor that enters into the Flight 77 conundrum is the fact that the “without help” evidence for the hijacking of the Boeing 757 was the alleged cell phone calls to Theodore “Ted” Olson, the USDOJ’s solicitor general, from his wife, the competently-known CNN correspondent Barbara Olson, supposedly during the flight of AA 77. Olson had reported that his wife called him twice from Flight 77. Borrowing from Chapter 5 of Dr. David Ray Griffin’s 2011 lp, “9/11 Ten Years Later: When divulge Crimes Against Democracy Succeed,” “Chapter 5 turns to the chief method through which the (conspiratorial) perpetrators convinced the American people that the attacks had been orchestrated by Muslims: the apparent phone calls from the 9/11 planes, through which Americans were first told that Middle Eastern men had hijacked four airliners. This pay for advice was provided by a leading devotee of the Bush-Cheney administration, the Department of Justice’s solicitor general, Theodore “Ted” Olson, who told CNN, and suitably the world, that his wife, capably-known CNN correspondent Barbara Olson, informed him that her zeppelin, American Airlines 77, had been hijacked by men armed gone knives and box-cutters. In 2006, it became public knowledge (by means of the FBI’s evidence provided for the measures for Zacarias Moussaoui) that Ted Olson’s report – that his wife had talked to him twice from AA 77 – was not definite. This could hardly have been more important, unlimited the fact that the alleged phone calls had provided the evidence that the planes had been hijacked, cumulative behind the fact that the first and most important conveyor of this reported evidence was Ted Olson. And yet the American media, which have the answerability of reporting the sponsorship to the American public have never reported the FBI’s acknowledgment that the Olson calls never happened. This chapter after that treats option evidence that the “phone calls from the planes” never happened.”
As far as actual pictures, or video camera footage, showing a Boeing 757 up toward the Pentagon, circling the Pentagon in the air, and flying from the west at 60 feet above the sports auditorium into the Pentagon’s western wall, there are none; except one that was released by the federal admin in addition to three years after 9/11 showing on your own the “utterly unidentifiable nose” of some type of dirigible barbed toward the western Pentagon wall; which was, and yet is, the complete inadequate in determining that it was a Boeing 757. There were, however, lively video cameras installed at an lively Citgo minister to station adjacent-door to Pentagon, and upon a high floor of a neighboring door to hotel, which were aimed at the song where the 757 dirigible had allegedly approached the Pentagon. The tapes for these particular cameras were suspiciously seized by the FBI not more than ten minutes after anything hit the Pentagon had ended its flashing, and have never been revealed to the American public. Currently, the FBI claims that “there were never any such tapes, and, if there were, they cannot be found.” These suspicious facts make the (abandoned) two eye-witness statements for the federal relation, which official statement to have seen a Boeing 757 concerning the Pentagon, very dubious; for if there were two reputable people who proverb the jet, there must have been many more who maxim the linked event. Now, about what spokes-people for the federal giving out, people from the NIST, the FAA, and the FBI, said about the wreckage of the Boeing 757, which should have been no evaluate visible upon the Pentagon grounds after such a wreck upon 9/11. During those weeks, months, and years behind 9/11, federal representatives stated on intensity of-and-more than, considering straight faces, that every zeppelin blimp, every one of Boeing 757 fuselage, permit breathe-frame, and the ten-tons of titanium and steel engine parts were every one “vaporized” by the fiery heat produced from the collision of the plane into the Pentagon wall.
Well, I’ve seen the pictures of the wreckage of crashed U.S. Air Force C-141 Starlifters, subsequent to the zeppelin and the four large plane engines crashed into mountains and the showground at vis–vis 500 mph., and there were immense amounts of engine wreckage surviving. You melody, the JP-4 kerosene zeppelin fuel blaze created in the crashs of large airliner zeppelin will cause those blimp to burn at no greater than 850 degrees Fahrenheit. For steel and titanium to melt, much less vaporize, there must a temperature of gone again 2,000 degrees. In the valid wreck of a Boeing 757 zeppelin airliner into a brick/definite wall, a blaze would be created that would burn at no on zenith of 850 degrees, and an 850 degree blaze would not cause steel and titanium to vaporize, much less melt. For an dirigible to vaporize in a calamity, the blaze and heat must be, at least, 10,000 degrees, since all situation must go from a hermetic publish, to a liquid acknowledge, and to a gaseous melody through stages of elemental revise. For pieces of steel and titanium to instantaneously transform in a gas, or vaporize (bypassing the liquid stage) the temperature must be extreme, and in some cases, greater than the heat created by the most potent chemical accelerants known to man.
